Moldau By Smetana Essays - Symphonic Poems, M Vlast, Bedich Smetana

Moldau By Smetana Author: Bedrich Smetana Work Title: The Moldau. For my first choice of music for this last undertaking I picked The Moldau by Bedrich Smetana. The reason I picked this piece was first, it is a musical sonnet and second, on the grounds that it consummately exemplified the utilization of patriot style and word painting. The Moldau is a musical sonnet speaking to Nationalist pride for Smetana's nation. It is the second of six musical sonnets from the symphonic piece My Nation. A musical sonnet is a one-development symphonic structure that, in this case, recommends a scene. It was composed over a five-year range that secured the upheaval contrary to Austrian principle. The Moldau is an ideal case of a patriot tune, which is a melody of society pride for one's nation. The piece The Moldau speaks to scenes along the waterway Moldau in Bohemia. It is here that we see the utilization of word painting, music communicated just as it were a painting to be seen. It starts as a couple of streams in the timberland streaming into the forceful waterway, painted with a woodwind and a few clarinets and prompting violins. The excursion takes us during a time in the woodland where we see chasing, laborers moving at a wedding, fairies in the evening glow, the St. John's Rapids, the Old Castle and back to the River topic as the waterway withers away. It is genuinely a captivating piece.

AMMONIUM NITRATE Essay Example For Students

AMMONIUM NITRATE Essay SCIENCE REPORTAMMONIUM NITRATENH4NO3ProblemOur task was to explore what the ideal proportion of solute to dissolvable that will create the greatest cooling/warming effect?HypothesisWith a littler amount of water (50mls) and a similar measure of Ammonium Nitrate included. After any timeframe the blend will be a cooler temperature than that of a blend with a bigger amount of water. Variables,XWater,XTeaspoons,XTime,XAmmonium Nitrate,XThermometer,XStirring (utilized thermometer),Changed/Uncontrolled Variables-The measure of times the blend was mixed. We blended the blend until the Ammonium Nitrate was broken up, so the measure of times we mixed after every teaspoon was unique. - Each teaspoon might not have been equivalent. Estimations were made dependent on judgment and not definite estimations. ,Controlled Variables-Amount of water utilized in each test was equivalent (100mls and 50mls). - Total measure of Ammonium Nitrate utilized (150grams). - Temperature was estimated after and specific time for example 1 moment, 2 minutes, 3 minutes. EquipmentTrial test,X1 thermometer,X1 plastic teaspoon,XSafety glasses,X100ml beaker,X30mls of water,X1 teaspoon of Ammonium Nitrate,X1 graduated cylinder,X1 mixing rodFirst Test,X1 thermometer,X1 plastic teaspoon,X1 stop watch,X1 blending rod,XSafety glasses X3 (one for each gathering member),X250ml beaker,X1 graduated cylinder,X150 grams of Ammonium Nitrate,X100mls of waterSecond Test,X1 thermometer,X1 plastic teaspoon,X1 stop watch,X1 mixing rod,XSafety glasses X3 (one for each gathering member),X100ml beaker,X1 graduated cylinder,Xleftover from unique 150 grams of Ammonium Nitrate,X50mls of waterNOTE: The mixing bar was not utilized in the First and Second trials, as it was not accessible. A substitute we utilized the thermometer. MethodsTrial TestIn a 100ml measuring glass 30mls of water was set the temperature of the water was recorded. 1 teaspoon of Ammonium Nitrate was added to the water and mixed until broke up. The temperature was then recorded once more. This was to see the distinction between the underlying temperature and the last temperature. First TestIn a 250ml recepticle place 100mls of water, measure the temperature of the water and record this underlying temperature onto a table. Set the clock and include one teaspoon of Ammonium Nitrate to the water, mix this ceaselessly until the Ammonium Nitrate has disintegrated. Following brief measure the temperature and record it, do this for a further 2 minutes (3 minutes altogether). Rehash this procedure for an aggregate of 10 teaspoons. Second TestIn a 100ml recepticle place 50mls of water, measure the temperature of the water and record this underlying temperature onto a table. Set the clock and include one teaspoon of Ammonium Nitrate to the water, mix this ceaselessly until the Ammonium Nitrate has broken down. Following brief measure the temperature and record it, do this for a further 2 minutes (3 minutes altogether). Rehash this procedure for an aggregate of 10 teaspoons. ConclusionAfter directing our endothermic investigations we can demonstrate that with less measure of water and an equivalent measure of Ammonium Nitrate included, the last temperature will be cooler than if we utilized a bigger measure of water. In this way, in principle, in the event that we utilized a bigger measure of water and included more teaspoons it will give the equivalent or comparative outcomes. This hypothesis should work on the off chance that it is done in relation to the first or second investigation.

A First Look at 2013 Admitted Freshmen Credentials - UGA Undergraduate Admissions

A First Look at 2013 Admitted Freshmen Credentials - UGA Undergraduate Admissions A First Look at 2013 Admitted Freshmen Credentials UGA once again attracted an exceptionally strong applicant pool this year. Competition for admission was stronger than ever. Our 21,000 applications were a significant increase over last year, but it was unfortunately not balanced with an equivalent increase in the number of possible spaces for enrolled freshmen, around 5,200. This goal still allowed us to offer admission to almost 11,000 students. For perspective, here are some basic statistics on those offered admission. Because simple averages and highest-lowest extreme for summarizing groups of students can be misleading, our professional associations and testing agencies recommend describing applicant, accepted and enrollment cohorts’ statistics using the “middle 50%.” Here is a first look at four basic factors showing who was ranked between the 25th and 75th percentile: • College Prep Grade Point Average: 3.77 4.05 (Please remember this is not the GPA students see on their high school transcript, but rather the GPA that UGA recalculates for everyone based on the core academic courses taken in high school and looking at the actual grades posted on the transcripts). • SAT Critical Reading + SAT Mathematics: 1200 1370 • SAT Writing: 590-690 • ACT Composite: 27 â€" 32 In addition, our average admitted student had taken 6 or more Advanced Placement and/or International Baccalaureate courses. Around 1,500 also enrolled in dual enrollment courses. While we consider AP and IB courses as factors indicative of a student’s curriculum difficulty, we also look at the entire course selection in light of each student’s chances for academic challenges. To that end accepted UGA students have taken a wide range of Honors and Advanced courses, summer enrichment programs, and college dual enrollment. Statistics, of course, cannot describe other crucial non-quantifiable qualities. Most UGA accepted applicants have exceptional high school records and undoubted potential for continued success in college. That was also true for the vast majority of the students to whom we were not able to offer admission. Valuable leadership capabilities, strong writing, being an active member of their school and community and showing great growth from freshman to senior year were all evident, especially as our Admissions professional staff read and re-read well over 8,000 packed folders prior to our final decisions. Congratulations to everyone in the college graduation class of 2017! For those of you admitted and ready to commit to UGA, don’t forget to send your University of Georgia commitment deposit NO LATER than May 1. Best of wishes to all, and… Go Dawgs!